Follow us on Twitter


Go Back   Tesla Motors Club Forum > General Forum > Technical > Battery Discussion

Battery Discussion Discussion about Electric Car Batteries

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 11-16-2007, 08:40 AM   #31 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,920
There would certainly be a lot more engineering required to integrate ultra-caps. One point brought up is that the voltage range from 'full' to 'empty' is much greater, so your PEM/inverter electronics would be more complicated.

Then there is the price/availability question...
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-16-2007, 10:40 AM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
WarpedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 771
Quote:
I have always thought Tesla should be using the "dual" system of Ultracaps and Lith batts to reduce the strain of stop and go driving on the cars chemical based power source.
Problem is, current ultracaps may not suffice. They bring too little on the table to be worth the effort, cost, added complexity and possible points of failure.

Quote:
One point brought up is that the voltage range from 'full' to 'empty' is much greater, so your PEM/inverter electronics would be more complicated.
Has anyone found out what could be done? Wide range DC/DC converters are supposed to be inefficient - efficient only in thin voltage range.

Sometime ago I was thinking of dynamically reconfigurable ultracap grid. When fully charged it would be mostly parallel connections, then as it discharges, the connections would reconfigure into serial ones keeping the outcoming voltage higher. Trouble is, this could be done as long the ultracap-storage still contained most of the total charge.
__________________
The Unofficial Tesla Roadster FAQ
Because, You've got questions!
WarpedOne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-16-2007, 01:59 PM   #33 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarpedOne View Post
Sometime ago I was thinking of dynamically reconfigurable ultracap grid. When fully charged it would be mostly parallel connections, then as it discharges, the connections would reconfigure into serial ones keeping the outcoming voltage higher.
From my semi-naive standpoint that sounds like an idea with some potential.
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-10-2008, 01:38 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
New hope for a successful EEStore?

GM-Volt.com Lockheed Martin Signs Agreement with EEStor
donauker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-11-2008, 01:08 PM   #36 (permalink)
Iz
Senior Member
 
Iz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 187
The Lockheed Martin article offers huge potential. Downside is lack of a prototype.

Assuming EEStor produces a battery (or equivalent) that gets > 500 mpc why would the volt even require an RE? Would be simpler and less expensive to make it a pure EV.

Hope WhiteStar decision makers are aware of EEStor’s progress.
Iz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2008, 12:55 PM   #37 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,920
Technology Review: A New Deal for EEStor
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2008, 01:32 PM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
WarpedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 771
Quote:
Lockheed has not seen a working prototype but said that qualification testing and mass production of EEStor's system is planned for late 2008.
I was hoping at least they've seen some actual product as those test were also planned long time ago. I am not counting on them any more. If they will come out with something then great, otherwise we'll just live with LiIon.

The Best is the enemy of the good. How very true.
__________________
The Unofficial Tesla Roadster FAQ
Because, You've got questions!
WarpedOne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-24-2008, 05:12 AM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 212
GM-Volt.com has a great interview with regards to the EESTOR. It's getting difficult not to get my hopes up.

As well as the Lockheed news there was also this.
domenick is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2008, 04:34 PM   #40 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,920
EESTOR Patent
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Sponsors
Click here to learn about advertising!


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
| Home | Register | FAQ | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |
Teslamotorsclub.com is in no way sponsored, endorsed, or affiliated by or with Tesla Motors, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries, suppliers, or vendors. ‘Tesla Motors’ and ‘Tesla Roadster’ are trademarks of Tesla Motors, Inc.
Click here to learn about advertising!